Francis Schaeffer once asked “how should we then live?” This is a good
question. It is one that ruffles our tendency to simply be nice. With purposeful
precision it strikes at the heart of every view of life. It raises the issue of
authority in Christianity’s ethical standards. Where do and should I derive my
morality? Does the Gospel require a type of outward conformity or are we saved
to licentiousness? Or does my conscience lead me in daily decision making? The
question forces us back to examine our ethical premises. Not a day goes past
without every one of us making ethical decisions. We are constantly determining
how to behave, what to look like, how to speak and so on. These are routine
everyday occurrences. Often these choices are so intrinsic and rudimentary that
they occur without much purposeful thought. In whatever setting we find
ourselves; church, home, work, etc; there are spoken and unspoken ethical
codes. Whether we like it or not “[a]ll
of life is ethical.”1 Society
and life is full of implicit codes of right and wrong. Schaffer’s question
drives us to ethical standards. Which then begs the question of sovereignty. In
other words, where should the ethical buck stop. Who’s in charge here and what
are the rules?
Skip to end of the article for more resources (free and to
purchase) by
clicking thisLINK.
The “sovereign…is one who is above all.”2
All systems of thought are governed by a sovereign. For many the human mind or
science determines fact from fiction,right from wrong. But when we tighten the definition it shows the
absurdity of these types of false sovereigns.The sovereign is “[o]ne who is above all, is independent and
unlimited by any other, and has independent and original authority…”3 The ultimate sovereign can thus only
describe the God of the Christian Scriptures. So far, so good. Just about every
evangelical Christian would say yes and amen, our God is the sovereign. But
there is more. What bearing does this have on the lives of those who profess
it? What relevance does this have on the 21st century church?
Perhaps another question will help. Ultimately, “[w]ill your life be founded
upon the sure rock of God’s word [the Bible], or the ruinous sands of
independent human opinion?”4 When all
is said and done, where does your ethical buck stop? Where does your ultimate
authority lie? These questions have vexed the modern church. Christians squirm
at the idea of an absolute ethical standard, one that we ought to conform to
and disciple society in. It is uncomfortable to our acceptance seeking nature. Often
we seek to serve two masters. What we must note is that every non-Christian philosophy
of life ultimately anchors its sovereignty, and therefore its ethical norms, in
autonomous man. Secular humanism wants nothing less than us to forget about the
Scripture in everyday (personal and societal) life. This causes a collision of
sovereigns. It goes all the way back to the Garden of Eden.
Christianity flows in a direction - from death (unto self) to being resurrected
by the Spirit of God. It is glorious pattern and is neither static nor
stagnant. Every kingdom is governed by its god. All false lords grope at
sovereignty through claiming ethical ultimacy. Caesar claimed to be the Lord,
god on earth. He demanded civil obedience to his laws. What is important to
note here is that all civil laws are ethical and ultimately religious by nature.
Do not steal, murder and the like are firmly anchored in the nature of God. By
the very nature of the case civil laws are religious. This is why the early church
was persecuted by Rome from the time of Nero Caesar. All citizens of the Roman
empire were to pay homage to the lord of the kingdom. Sovereigns collided as
the church proclaimed “all authority in heaven and earth” ( Matthew 28:18)
resided in the resurrected Messiah.5 The
sovereignty of governments (and man) is either limited or tyrannical. Salvific flow
is from bondage to liberation. The individual, family, church and society are
freed from tyranny. However, freedom is not unto lawlessness ( 1 John 3:4). The
ruler of the kings of the earth ( Revelation 1:5) demands obedience to His law
( John 14:15, 1 John 5:3). Obedience is ethical in nature. Every kingdom is
undergirded by societal norms of right and wrong. If this were not the case
licentiousness and chaos would rule. As the children of the covenant we have
been saved unto good works. It is our responsibility to walk in faithful
obedience ( Luke 6:46-49). Good works are not the vehicle to reach salvation.
Rather, they are the road godly saints travel within the kingdom. We must ask
an important question here – what is Christianity’s yardstick? In other words,
how do we know we are travelling on the right road? The answer is rather
straight forward. But it will be both necessary and profitable to first explore
culture.
Henry Van Til aptly asks; “[a]re we justified in turning the world and
culture over to the enemies of God?”6 TS Elliot
frame culture as “religion lived out.”7
This is a fundamental Biblical them. Out of the heart flow the issues of life
( Proverbs 4:23, Matthew 12:34-35). Outward actions reflect inner, heart,
convictions. Christianity is not a navel gazing religion. God demands us to be
perfect ( Matthew 5:48) and knows that all sin ( Romans 3:23and 1 John 1:10). John
the Baptist’s parents were “both righteous before God, walking in all the
commandments and ordinances of the Lord blameless” ( Luke 1:6). They were
perfect. However, Zacharias and Elizabeth were conceived in iniquity (Psalm
51:5), personally sinned and fell short of the glory of God ( Romans 3:23). But
they were perfect. The flow of the text is not perfectionism or legalism, righteousness
outside the grace of God. Rather the text follows the pattern of death and
resurrection. These two faithful saints obeyed the Law of God because God first
loved them ( 1 John 4:19). When they sinned both fulfilled the requirements of
the Law; repent, bring the appropriate sacrifice and make restitution if
necessary. There is no inconsistency here. The text follows the pattern and
flow of Scripture. Zacharias and Elizabeth were not legalists. They simply
trusted and obeyed their King. Should we not follow the same pattern?
What does this have to do with culture and external actions? A great deal! The
power of the Gospel is both inward and outward. God is concerned with our
hearts and our actions. He is not satisfied with the individualism of navel
gazing nor the naivite of a fruitless salvation. The flow of salvation is
again, onward and upward. We are saved from death to life; being baptised with
Christ in death and raised with Him in life. Sinners are taken from darkness
into the light. The effects of salvation must flow through our fingertips. All
that we do is to bring glory to God. The question is how? Now we can join the
sovereignty and culture dots. God is sovereign. His Christ is: the King of
kings and lord of Lords, the holder of all authority in heaven and earth
( Matthew 28:18), the king of the rulers of the world ( Revelation 1:5), seated
in heaven having all His enemies subdued ( Psalm 2, 1 Corinthians 15, Ephesians
1:22 Hebrews 2:8). Like all kingdoms the King’s empire is governed by His
sovereign Law ( Matthew 5:17-19, Luke 6:46-49, John 14:15). Now where is this
kingdom? Is it merely in the heart? No, the flow of Scripture determines that the
earth is the Lord’s and everything therein ( Psalm 24:1, 1 Corinthians 10:26).
Is it simply within the church? Surely not, the pattern is for the church is to
go out and disciple the nations and teach them to obey the King’s Law (Matthew
28:18-20). So salvation and discipleship should not simply be an inward,
personal activity. It needs to flow out. Just as Adam was to go out glorifying
the world. As the rivers flowed from the Garden he was to take dominion from
the Garden of Eden, through the land of Eden and down to ends of the world. We
are to do likewise.
But how? Are we talking about conversions or relationships or missions? Yes and
no. The Bride of Christ is to make the surrounding peoples jealous! How,
through faithful obedience to the Law of God ( Matthew 5:17-19, Luke 6:46-49,
John 14:15). Following our own inclination of what is righteous and proper
either leads to licentiousness or legalism. Our minds are not sovereign. We are
not capable of pleasing God, no matter how good it feels. As Christians the Law
of God is written upon our hearts ( Hebrews 8). God is unchanging. This is the
same Law as that of the Old Testament. Of course we are not to become
Pharisaically oriented. But “[n]ot only did the Pharisees demonstrate their
unlawful legalism by concern merely for external behavior, they also abused the
law by not using it in the manner God intended. The Pharisees had set out to
establish their own righteousness by means of the law; they expected that God
would justify them on the basis of the moral merit they had earned. The
Pharisees attempted to justify themselves by means of the law.”8
Our justification is rooted in the righteousness of God ( Jeremiah 23:6). We are
saved by grace through the gift of justifying faith ( Ephesians 2:8-9). The Law
does not bring salvation ( Galatians 3:11), it identifies sin ( 1 John 3:4) and
is the yardstick for obedient faith. Our actions are to flow from a new heart. Only
from a redeemed heart will a life of faith to the Scriptures proceed. As
Christians we should be debating the application of the entire council of God, rather
than whether it applies to our lives. With all good conscience we cannot
discard more than two thirds of the Scriptures. God is both interested in our
hearts and actions. They are not mutually exclusive realms. In fact Jesus
states they cannot be. The heart produces external fruit.
More
reading and resources For Free I have referenced the late Dr Greg L Bahnsen's book By This
Standard ~ The Authority of God's Law Today. In this book you can
learn about law and grace. Dr Bahnsen powerfully shows how God's Laws
are still relevant in modern culture. This book is a wonderful
introduction to God's Law. It is not written at an overly technical
level. So lay person and preacher alike will enjoy this refreshing look
at how God's forgiveness does not give us a license to sin. Jesus and
the law of God are not mutually exclusive in God's church. The grace of
Christ does not abolish the usefulness and application of the law.
Christian grace has a foundation. It is found in the character of God,
which is reflected in His Law. There is antithesis in law and grace.
They are mutually inclusive. Dr Bahnsen powerfully shows how God was
truly gracious in giving His creature His Law.
You can download this book in PDF for free at this LINK
(it is 3.3 mb). This is the entire book in PDF and it is free.
For Sale Alternatively you can purchase (AUD25) By This Standard ~ The Authority of God's Law Today from
our the ASH eShop at this LINK
.
Notes
1 Bahnsen GL, By
This Standard, The Authority of God’s Law Today, 2008, American VisionPress, Powder Springs, p. 9. You can purchase this
book here:LINK.
2 Rushdoony R J, Sovereignty,
2007, Ross House Books, California, p. 1