• Decrease font size
  • Reset font size to default
  • Increase font size

eNewsletters

Sign-up to receive our eNewsletters
ASH News


Receive HTML?

User Login

Christianity Scripture and Climate Change PDF Print E-mail
User Rating: / 4
PoorBest 
Written by Dr. Geoff Downes   
 
Views 430    
Favoured 17

praise_al_gore.jpgDr Geoff Downes is a scientist who works in Tasmania. He is concerned with the current climate change and global warming hysteria. We at Anselm Study House see the climate change and global warming debate to be challenging the supremacy of the ascended Christ. If we do not bow to climate change conventions and treaties then we are apparently foolish. I would strongly recommend that you listen to Lord Monckton regarding this issue and the treaty which our government is set to sign in Copenhagen in December. I think there is much wisdom in the words of Roman Emperor Marcus Aurelius (AD 121-180);


The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane.


Dr Downes will seek to give us some insights into the current hysteria through a series of short (non-technical) articles over the coming weeks/months. Now over to Dr Downes... 

You may have heard of the climate change debate. Ok I jest. If you haven’t heard, you need to get out more. There’s very little else in the news nowadays and the issue is increasingly impacting our lives socially, economically and spiritually. That is, the debate rather than climate change fitself. As a practising research scientist, the issue heavily influences my research activities. There is little chance of getting significant research support unless my proposals address the issue in some noteworthy manner. And as you may have heard there is now a scientific consensus that anthropogenic climate change threatens our very existence on this planet. Mind you I never could get research funding to address topics such as “The positive effects of increasing carbon dioxide on forest productivity” or “Will fossil fuel consumption improve productivity and enhance water use efficiency of crops.” No. The projects all have to address the concerns we have over the negative impacts. Change by definition is bad. Odd really, when most of the supposed drivers of biological evolution have been environmental changes of one kind or another. It is difficult not to get a little cynical. But then Mr Rudd lumps me in with the mafia and child molesters as one of those dangerous elements of society that want to hurt people.

So how should a Christian respond? If, and as I have time, I’ll try to address some of the issues as they occur to me, assuming I am not arrested in the meantime. [I’m not paranoid, it’s just that they're all out to get me!]

Perhaps a good place to start is our Christian presuppositions. Epistemology is the study of how we know what we know. Every person who has ever lived, without exception, starts their thinking on a foundation of faith. For the atheist it’s faith that the chemical reactions that constitute our brain activity can be trusted, and that some how a neuron firing can be not only interpreted as “on or off” but as “good or bad”. i.e. that they can make an ‘ought” out of an “is”. (Maybe that’s what the God particle does?)

Sadly many Christians begin their reasoning in the same way and try to reason to the existence of God starting from “neutral” facts. But no facts are neutral. Neutrality is a myth. (And as we all know a myth is a female moth).

The existence of God requires no defence; it is proved by the impossibility of the contrary. As Christians we start our thinking from the foundation of the Scriptures as the infallible Word of God. Their authority also requires no defence; they are self-authenticating. Starting from the presupposition of that authority, we then have a reason to trust our logic and reasoning process as we were created in the image of God. We can account for the existence of absolute standards or right and wrong; we have a basis for “ought”. So what does the Bible tell us about climate change and the future of our planet? Should we be concerned? What role should government play? Is there only one right way to deal with the issue? These are tough questions. Over the coming weeks we will seek to address 4 important issues in this debate; humans as a cancer on the world, God’s plan in history, some science in the climate pot, and modern day prophets and GCM’s.
Published in : Worldviews, Apologetics
Quote this article in website Favoured Print Send to friend Related articles Save this to del.icio.us

Users' Comments (3) RSS feed comment
Posted by Mike Bull, on 18-11-2009 02:03, IP 121.44.237.174, Guest
1. globally cool
Thanks Trev. I look forward to it.
 
» Report this comment to administrator
» Reply to this comment...

Posted by mrs gloria eccles, on 18-11-2009 01:33, IP 58.168.71.235, Guest
2. Looking forward
Looking forward to the future information - an absorbing topic
 
» Report this comment to administrator
» Reply to this comment...

Posted by alastair, on 18-11-2009 01:01, IP 124.189.70.14, Guest
3. Climate Change
:) Thanks Trev and Geoff 
This is an intriguing topic. Much of the problem, I believe, lies in the general uniformitarian views of most evolutionists who ignore the Bible. 1 Thessalonians 5:21 instructs us to examine everything carefully and to hold fast to what is good. The proponents of global warming are quick to ignore anything but their own opinions. This discounts them as seekers of the truth. Just as the speculative humanist/evolutionist assumptions of the past are proving unworthy of any factual substance(because they are unobservable), so too the speculative predictions of the future are just that - speculative - and therefore equally untrustworthy. What is undeniably true and free from all speculative hype is the unwavering Word of God. I look forward to your more qualified (than mine!) thoughts on this issue over the coming weeks. I'm warming to the issue!
 
» Report this comment to administrator
» Reply to this comment...

Add your comment



mXcomment 1.0.9 © 2007-2010 - visualclinic.fr
License Creative Commons - Some rights reserved
< Prev   Next >